cachepc-linux

Fork of AMDESE/linux with modifications for CachePC side-channel attack
git clone https://git.sinitax.com/sinitax/cachepc-linux
Log | Files | Refs | README | LICENSE | sfeed.txt

path-lookup.rst (71264B)


      1===============
      2Pathname lookup
      3===============
      4
      5This write-up is based on three articles published at lwn.net:
      6
      7- <https://lwn.net/Articles/649115/> Pathname lookup in Linux
      8- <https://lwn.net/Articles/649729/> RCU-walk: faster pathname lookup in Linux
      9- <https://lwn.net/Articles/650786/> A walk among the symlinks
     10
     11Written by Neil Brown with help from Al Viro and Jon Corbet.
     12It has subsequently been updated to reflect changes in the kernel
     13including:
     14
     15- per-directory parallel name lookup.
     16- ``openat2()`` resolution restriction flags.
     17
     18Introduction to pathname lookup
     19===============================
     20
     21The most obvious aspect of pathname lookup, which very little
     22exploration is needed to discover, is that it is complex.  There are
     23many rules, special cases, and implementation alternatives that all
     24combine to confuse the unwary reader.  Computer science has long been
     25acquainted with such complexity and has tools to help manage it.  One
     26tool that we will make extensive use of is "divide and conquer".  For
     27the early parts of the analysis we will divide off symlinks - leaving
     28them until the final part.  Well before we get to symlinks we have
     29another major division based on the VFS's approach to locking which
     30will allow us to review "REF-walk" and "RCU-walk" separately.  But we
     31are getting ahead of ourselves.  There are some important low level
     32distinctions we need to clarify first.
     33
     34There are two sorts of ...
     35--------------------------
     36
     37.. _openat: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/openat.2.html
     38
     39Pathnames (sometimes "file names"), used to identify objects in the
     40filesystem, will be familiar to most readers.  They contain two sorts
     41of elements: "slashes" that are sequences of one or more "``/``"
     42characters, and "components" that are sequences of one or more
     43non-"``/``" characters.  These form two kinds of paths.  Those that
     44start with slashes are "absolute" and start from the filesystem root.
     45The others are "relative" and start from the current directory, or
     46from some other location specified by a file descriptor given to
     47"``*at()``" system calls such as `openat() <openat_>`_.
     48
     49.. _execveat: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/execveat.2.html
     50
     51It is tempting to describe the second kind as starting with a
     52component, but that isn't always accurate: a pathname can lack both
     53slashes and components, it can be empty, in other words.  This is
     54generally forbidden in POSIX, but some of those "``*at()``" system calls
     55in Linux permit it when the ``AT_EMPTY_PATH`` flag is given.  For
     56example, if you have an open file descriptor on an executable file you
     57can execute it by calling `execveat() <execveat_>`_ passing
     58the file descriptor, an empty path, and the ``AT_EMPTY_PATH`` flag.
     59
     60These paths can be divided into two sections: the final component and
     61everything else.  The "everything else" is the easy bit.  In all cases
     62it must identify a directory that already exists, otherwise an error
     63such as ``ENOENT`` or ``ENOTDIR`` will be reported.
     64
     65The final component is not so simple.  Not only do different system
     66calls interpret it quite differently (e.g. some create it, some do
     67not), but it might not even exist: neither the empty pathname nor the
     68pathname that is just slashes have a final component.  If it does
     69exist, it could be "``.``" or "``..``" which are handled quite differently
     70from other components.
     71
     72.. _POSIX: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_12
     73
     74If a pathname ends with a slash, such as "``/tmp/foo/``" it might be
     75tempting to consider that to have an empty final component.  In many
     76ways that would lead to correct results, but not always.  In
     77particular, ``mkdir()`` and ``rmdir()`` each create or remove a directory named
     78by the final component, and they are required to work with pathnames
     79ending in "``/``".  According to POSIX_:
     80
     81  A pathname that contains at least one non-<slash> character and
     82  that ends with one or more trailing <slash> characters shall not
     83  be resolved successfully unless the last pathname component before
     84  the trailing <slash> characters names an existing directory or a
     85  directory entry that is to be created for a directory immediately
     86  after the pathname is resolved.
     87
     88The Linux pathname walking code (mostly in ``fs/namei.c``) deals with
     89all of these issues: breaking the path into components, handling the
     90"everything else" quite separately from the final component, and
     91checking that the trailing slash is not used where it isn't
     92permitted.  It also addresses the important issue of concurrent
     93access.
     94
     95While one process is looking up a pathname, another might be making
     96changes that affect that lookup.  One fairly extreme case is that if
     97"a/b" were renamed to "a/c/b" while another process were looking up
     98"a/b/..", that process might successfully resolve on "a/c".
     99Most races are much more subtle, and a big part of the task of
    100pathname lookup is to prevent them from having damaging effects.  Many
    101of the possible races are seen most clearly in the context of the
    102"dcache" and an understanding of that is central to understanding
    103pathname lookup.
    104
    105More than just a cache
    106----------------------
    107
    108The "dcache" caches information about names in each filesystem to
    109make them quickly available for lookup.  Each entry (known as a
    110"dentry") contains three significant fields: a component name, a
    111pointer to a parent dentry, and a pointer to the "inode" which
    112contains further information about the object in that parent with
    113the given name.  The inode pointer can be ``NULL`` indicating that the
    114name doesn't exist in the parent.  While there can be linkage in the
    115dentry of a directory to the dentries of the children, that linkage is
    116not used for pathname lookup, and so will not be considered here.
    117
    118The dcache has a number of uses apart from accelerating lookup.  One
    119that will be particularly relevant is that it is closely integrated
    120with the mount table that records which filesystem is mounted where.
    121What the mount table actually stores is which dentry is mounted on top
    122of which other dentry.
    123
    124When considering the dcache, we have another of our "two types"
    125distinctions: there are two types of filesystems.
    126
    127Some filesystems ensure that the information in the dcache is always
    128completely accurate (though not necessarily complete).  This can allow
    129the VFS to determine if a particular file does or doesn't exist
    130without checking with the filesystem, and means that the VFS can
    131protect the filesystem against certain races and other problems.
    132These are typically "local" filesystems such as ext3, XFS, and Btrfs.
    133
    134Other filesystems don't provide that guarantee because they cannot.
    135These are typically filesystems that are shared across a network,
    136whether remote filesystems like NFS and 9P, or cluster filesystems
    137like ocfs2 or cephfs.  These filesystems allow the VFS to revalidate
    138cached information, and must provide their own protection against
    139awkward races.  The VFS can detect these filesystems by the
    140``DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE`` flag being set in the dentry.
    141
    142REF-walk: simple concurrency management with refcounts and spinlocks
    143--------------------------------------------------------------------
    144
    145With all of those divisions carefully classified, we can now start
    146looking at the actual process of walking along a path.  In particular
    147we will start with the handling of the "everything else" part of a
    148pathname, and focus on the "REF-walk" approach to concurrency
    149management.  This code is found in the ``link_path_walk()`` function, if
    150you ignore all the places that only run when "``LOOKUP_RCU``"
    151(indicating the use of RCU-walk) is set.
    152
    153.. _Meet the Lockers: https://lwn.net/Articles/453685/
    154
    155REF-walk is fairly heavy-handed with locks and reference counts.  Not
    156as heavy-handed as in the old "big kernel lock" days, but certainly not
    157afraid of taking a lock when one is needed.  It uses a variety of
    158different concurrency controls.  A background understanding of the
    159various primitives is assumed, or can be gleaned from elsewhere such
    160as in `Meet the Lockers`_.
    161
    162The locking mechanisms used by REF-walk include:
    163
    164dentry->d_lockref
    165~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    166
    167This uses the lockref primitive to provide both a spinlock and a
    168reference count.  The special-sauce of this primitive is that the
    169conceptual sequence "lock; inc_ref; unlock;" can often be performed
    170with a single atomic memory operation.
    171
    172Holding a reference on a dentry ensures that the dentry won't suddenly
    173be freed and used for something else, so the values in various fields
    174will behave as expected.  It also protects the ``->d_inode`` reference
    175to the inode to some extent.
    176
    177The association between a dentry and its inode is fairly permanent.
    178For example, when a file is renamed, the dentry and inode move
    179together to the new location.  When a file is created the dentry will
    180initially be negative (i.e. ``d_inode`` is ``NULL``), and will be assigned
    181to the new inode as part of the act of creation.
    182
    183When a file is deleted, this can be reflected in the cache either by
    184setting ``d_inode`` to ``NULL``, or by removing it from the hash table
    185(described shortly) used to look up the name in the parent directory.
    186If the dentry is still in use the second option is used as it is
    187perfectly legal to keep using an open file after it has been deleted
    188and having the dentry around helps.  If the dentry is not otherwise in
    189use (i.e. if the refcount in ``d_lockref`` is one), only then will
    190``d_inode`` be set to ``NULL``.  Doing it this way is more efficient for a
    191very common case.
    192
    193So as long as a counted reference is held to a dentry, a non-``NULL`` ``->d_inode``
    194value will never be changed.
    195
    196dentry->d_lock
    197~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    198
    199``d_lock`` is a synonym for the spinlock that is part of ``d_lockref`` above.
    200For our purposes, holding this lock protects against the dentry being
    201renamed or unlinked.  In particular, its parent (``d_parent``), and its
    202name (``d_name``) cannot be changed, and it cannot be removed from the
    203dentry hash table.
    204
    205When looking for a name in a directory, REF-walk takes ``d_lock`` on
    206each candidate dentry that it finds in the hash table and then checks
    207that the parent and name are correct.  So it doesn't lock the parent
    208while searching in the cache; it only locks children.
    209
    210When looking for the parent for a given name (to handle "``..``"),
    211REF-walk can take ``d_lock`` to get a stable reference to ``d_parent``,
    212but it first tries a more lightweight approach.  As seen in
    213``dget_parent()``, if a reference can be claimed on the parent, and if
    214subsequently ``d_parent`` can be seen to have not changed, then there is
    215no need to actually take the lock on the child.
    216
    217rename_lock
    218~~~~~~~~~~~
    219
    220Looking up a given name in a given directory involves computing a hash
    221from the two values (the name and the dentry of the directory),
    222accessing that slot in a hash table, and searching the linked list
    223that is found there.
    224
    225When a dentry is renamed, the name and the parent dentry can both
    226change so the hash will almost certainly change too.  This would move the
    227dentry to a different chain in the hash table.  If a filename search
    228happened to be looking at a dentry that was moved in this way,
    229it might end up continuing the search down the wrong chain,
    230and so miss out on part of the correct chain.
    231
    232The name-lookup process (``d_lookup()``) does *not* try to prevent this
    233from happening, but only to detect when it happens.
    234``rename_lock`` is a seqlock that is updated whenever any dentry is
    235renamed.  If ``d_lookup`` finds that a rename happened while it
    236unsuccessfully scanned a chain in the hash table, it simply tries
    237again.
    238
    239``rename_lock`` is also used to detect and defend against potential attacks
    240against ``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` and ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` when resolving ".." (where
    241the parent directory is moved outside the root, bypassing the ``path_equal()``
    242check). If ``rename_lock`` is updated during the lookup and the path encounters
    243a "..", a potential attack occurred and ``handle_dots()`` will bail out with
    244``-EAGAIN``.
    245
    246inode->i_rwsem
    247~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    248
    249``i_rwsem`` is a read/write semaphore that serializes all changes to a particular
    250directory.  This ensures that, for example, an ``unlink()`` and a ``rename()``
    251cannot both happen at the same time.  It also keeps the directory
    252stable while the filesystem is asked to look up a name that is not
    253currently in the dcache or, optionally, when the list of entries in a
    254directory is being retrieved with ``readdir()``.
    255
    256This has a complementary role to that of ``d_lock``: ``i_rwsem`` on a
    257directory protects all of the names in that directory, while ``d_lock``
    258on a name protects just one name in a directory.  Most changes to the
    259dcache hold ``i_rwsem`` on the relevant directory inode and briefly take
    260``d_lock`` on one or more the dentries while the change happens.  One
    261exception is when idle dentries are removed from the dcache due to
    262memory pressure.  This uses ``d_lock``, but ``i_rwsem`` plays no role.
    263
    264The semaphore affects pathname lookup in two distinct ways.  Firstly it
    265prevents changes during lookup of a name in a directory.  ``walk_component()`` uses
    266``lookup_fast()`` first which, in turn, checks to see if the name is in the cache,
    267using only ``d_lock`` locking.  If the name isn't found, then ``walk_component()``
    268falls back to ``lookup_slow()`` which takes a shared lock on ``i_rwsem``, checks again that
    269the name isn't in the cache, and then calls in to the filesystem to get a
    270definitive answer.  A new dentry will be added to the cache regardless of
    271the result.
    272
    273Secondly, when pathname lookup reaches the final component, it will
    274sometimes need to take an exclusive lock on ``i_rwsem`` before performing the last lookup so
    275that the required exclusion can be achieved.  How path lookup chooses
    276to take, or not take, ``i_rwsem`` is one of the
    277issues addressed in a subsequent section.
    278
    279If two threads attempt to look up the same name at the same time - a
    280name that is not yet in the dcache - the shared lock on ``i_rwsem`` will
    281not prevent them both adding new dentries with the same name.  As this
    282would result in confusion an extra level of interlocking is used,
    283based around a secondary hash table (``in_lookup_hashtable``) and a
    284per-dentry flag bit (``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP``).
    285
    286To add a new dentry to the cache while only holding a shared lock on
    287``i_rwsem``, a thread must call ``d_alloc_parallel()``.  This allocates a
    288dentry, stores the required name and parent in it, checks if there
    289is already a matching dentry in the primary or secondary hash
    290tables, and if not, stores the newly allocated dentry in the secondary
    291hash table, with ``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP`` set.
    292
    293If a matching dentry was found in the primary hash table then that is
    294returned and the caller can know that it lost a race with some other
    295thread adding the entry.  If no matching dentry is found in either
    296cache, the newly allocated dentry is returned and the caller can
    297detect this from the presence of ``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP``.  In this case it
    298knows that it has won any race and now is responsible for asking the
    299filesystem to perform the lookup and find the matching inode.  When
    300the lookup is complete, it must call ``d_lookup_done()`` which clears
    301the flag and does some other house keeping, including removing the
    302dentry from the secondary hash table - it will normally have been
    303added to the primary hash table already.  Note that a ``struct
    304waitqueue_head`` is passed to ``d_alloc_parallel()``, and
    305``d_lookup_done()`` must be called while this ``waitqueue_head`` is still
    306in scope.
    307
    308If a matching dentry is found in the secondary hash table,
    309``d_alloc_parallel()`` has a little more work to do. It first waits for
    310``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP`` to be cleared, using a wait_queue that was passed
    311to the instance of ``d_alloc_parallel()`` that won the race and that
    312will be woken by the call to ``d_lookup_done()``.  It then checks to see
    313if the dentry has now been added to the primary hash table.  If it
    314has, the dentry is returned and the caller just sees that it lost any
    315race.  If it hasn't been added to the primary hash table, the most
    316likely explanation is that some other dentry was added instead using
    317``d_splice_alias()``.  In any case, ``d_alloc_parallel()`` repeats all the
    318look ups from the start and will normally return something from the
    319primary hash table.
    320
    321mnt->mnt_count
    322~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    323
    324``mnt_count`` is a per-CPU reference counter on "``mount``" structures.
    325Per-CPU here means that incrementing the count is cheap as it only
    326uses CPU-local memory, but checking if the count is zero is expensive as
    327it needs to check with every CPU.  Taking a ``mnt_count`` reference
    328prevents the mount structure from disappearing as the result of regular
    329unmount operations, but does not prevent a "lazy" unmount.  So holding
    330``mnt_count`` doesn't ensure that the mount remains in the namespace and,
    331in particular, doesn't stabilize the link to the mounted-on dentry.  It
    332does, however, ensure that the ``mount`` data structure remains coherent,
    333and it provides a reference to the root dentry of the mounted
    334filesystem.  So a reference through ``->mnt_count`` provides a stable
    335reference to the mounted dentry, but not the mounted-on dentry.
    336
    337mount_lock
    338~~~~~~~~~~
    339
    340``mount_lock`` is a global seqlock, a bit like ``rename_lock``.  It can be used to
    341check if any change has been made to any mount points.
    342
    343While walking down the tree (away from the root) this lock is used when
    344crossing a mount point to check that the crossing was safe.  That is,
    345the value in the seqlock is read, then the code finds the mount that
    346is mounted on the current directory, if there is one, and increments
    347the ``mnt_count``.  Finally the value in ``mount_lock`` is checked against
    348the old value.  If there is no change, then the crossing was safe.  If there
    349was a change, the ``mnt_count`` is decremented and the whole process is
    350retried.
    351
    352When walking up the tree (towards the root) by following a ".." link,
    353a little more care is needed.  In this case the seqlock (which
    354contains both a counter and a spinlock) is fully locked to prevent
    355any changes to any mount points while stepping up.  This locking is
    356needed to stabilize the link to the mounted-on dentry, which the
    357refcount on the mount itself doesn't ensure.
    358
    359``mount_lock`` is also used to detect and defend against potential attacks
    360against ``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` and ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` when resolving ".." (where
    361the parent directory is moved outside the root, bypassing the ``path_equal()``
    362check). If ``mount_lock`` is updated during the lookup and the path encounters
    363a "..", a potential attack occurred and ``handle_dots()`` will bail out with
    364``-EAGAIN``.
    365
    366RCU
    367~~~
    368
    369Finally the global (but extremely lightweight) RCU read lock is held
    370from time to time to ensure certain data structures don't get freed
    371unexpectedly.
    372
    373In particular it is held while scanning chains in the dcache hash
    374table, and the mount point hash table.
    375
    376Bringing it together with ``struct nameidata``
    377----------------------------------------------
    378
    379.. _First edition Unix: https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V1/u2.s
    380
    381Throughout the process of walking a path, the current status is stored
    382in a ``struct nameidata``, "namei" being the traditional name - dating
    383all the way back to `First Edition Unix`_ - of the function that
    384converts a "name" to an "inode".  ``struct nameidata`` contains (among
    385other fields):
    386
    387``struct path path``
    388~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    389
    390A ``path`` contains a ``struct vfsmount`` (which is
    391embedded in a ``struct mount``) and a ``struct dentry``.  Together these
    392record the current status of the walk.  They start out referring to the
    393starting point (the current working directory, the root directory, or some other
    394directory identified by a file descriptor), and are updated on each
    395step.  A reference through ``d_lockref`` and ``mnt_count`` is always
    396held.
    397
    398``struct qstr last``
    399~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    400
    401This is a string together with a length (i.e. *not* ``nul`` terminated)
    402that is the "next" component in the pathname.
    403
    404``int last_type``
    405~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    406
    407This is one of ``LAST_NORM``, ``LAST_ROOT``, ``LAST_DOT`` or ``LAST_DOTDOT``.
    408The ``last`` field is only valid if the type is ``LAST_NORM``.
    409
    410``struct path root``
    411~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    412
    413This is used to hold a reference to the effective root of the
    414filesystem.  Often that reference won't be needed, so this field is
    415only assigned the first time it is used, or when a non-standard root
    416is requested.  Keeping a reference in the ``nameidata`` ensures that
    417only one root is in effect for the entire path walk, even if it races
    418with a ``chroot()`` system call.
    419
    420It should be noted that in the case of ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` or
    421``LOOKUP_BENEATH``, the effective root becomes the directory file descriptor
    422passed to ``openat2()`` (which exposes these ``LOOKUP_`` flags).
    423
    424The root is needed when either of two conditions holds: (1) either the
    425pathname or a symbolic link starts with a "'/'", or (2) a "``..``"
    426component is being handled, since "``..``" from the root must always stay
    427at the root.  The value used is usually the current root directory of
    428the calling process.  An alternate root can be provided as when
    429``sysctl()`` calls ``file_open_root()``, and when NFSv4 or Btrfs call
    430``mount_subtree()``.  In each case a pathname is being looked up in a very
    431specific part of the filesystem, and the lookup must not be allowed to
    432escape that subtree.  It works a bit like a local ``chroot()``.
    433
    434Ignoring the handling of symbolic links, we can now describe the
    435"``link_path_walk()``" function, which handles the lookup of everything
    436except the final component as:
    437
    438   Given a path (``name``) and a nameidata structure (``nd``), check that the
    439   current directory has execute permission and then advance ``name``
    440   over one component while updating ``last_type`` and ``last``.  If that
    441   was the final component, then return, otherwise call
    442   ``walk_component()`` and repeat from the top.
    443
    444``walk_component()`` is even easier.  If the component is ``LAST_DOTS``,
    445it calls ``handle_dots()`` which does the necessary locking as already
    446described.  If it finds a ``LAST_NORM`` component it first calls
    447"``lookup_fast()``" which only looks in the dcache, but will ask the
    448filesystem to revalidate the result if it is that sort of filesystem.
    449If that doesn't get a good result, it calls "``lookup_slow()``" which
    450takes ``i_rwsem``, rechecks the cache, and then asks the filesystem
    451to find a definitive answer.
    452
    453As the last step of walk_component(), step_into() will be called either
    454directly from walk_component() or from handle_dots().  It calls
    455handle_mounts(), to check and handle mount points, in which a new
    456``struct path`` is created containing a counted reference to the new dentry and
    457a reference to the new ``vfsmount`` which is only counted if it is
    458different from the previous ``vfsmount``. Then if there is
    459a symbolic link, step_into() calls pick_link() to deal with it,
    460otherwise it installs the new ``struct path`` in the ``struct nameidata``, and
    461drops the unneeded references.
    462
    463This "hand-over-hand" sequencing of getting a reference to the new
    464dentry before dropping the reference to the previous dentry may
    465seem obvious, but is worth pointing out so that we will recognize its
    466analogue in the "RCU-walk" version.
    467
    468Handling the final component
    469----------------------------
    470
    471``link_path_walk()`` only walks as far as setting ``nd->last`` and
    472``nd->last_type`` to refer to the final component of the path.  It does
    473not call ``walk_component()`` that last time.  Handling that final
    474component remains for the caller to sort out. Those callers are
    475path_lookupat(), path_parentat() and
    476path_openat() each of which handles the differing requirements of
    477different system calls.
    478
    479``path_parentat()`` is clearly the simplest - it just wraps a little bit
    480of housekeeping around ``link_path_walk()`` and returns the parent
    481directory and final component to the caller.  The caller will be either
    482aiming to create a name (via ``filename_create()``) or remove or rename
    483a name (in which case ``user_path_parent()`` is used).  They will use
    484``i_rwsem`` to exclude other changes while they validate and then
    485perform their operation.
    486
    487``path_lookupat()`` is nearly as simple - it is used when an existing
    488object is wanted such as by ``stat()`` or ``chmod()``.  It essentially just
    489calls ``walk_component()`` on the final component through a call to
    490``lookup_last()``.  ``path_lookupat()`` returns just the final dentry.
    491It is worth noting that when flag ``LOOKUP_MOUNTPOINT`` is set,
    492path_lookupat() will unset LOOKUP_JUMPED in nameidata so that in the
    493subsequent path traversal d_weak_revalidate() won't be called.
    494This is important when unmounting a filesystem that is inaccessible, such as
    495one provided by a dead NFS server.
    496
    497Finally ``path_openat()`` is used for the ``open()`` system call; it
    498contains, in support functions starting with "open_last_lookups()", all the
    499complexity needed to handle the different subtleties of O_CREAT (with
    500or without O_EXCL), final "``/``" characters, and trailing symbolic
    501links.  We will revisit this in the final part of this series, which
    502focuses on those symbolic links.  "open_last_lookups()" will sometimes, but
    503not always, take ``i_rwsem``, depending on what it finds.
    504
    505Each of these, or the functions which call them, need to be alert to
    506the possibility that the final component is not ``LAST_NORM``.  If the
    507goal of the lookup is to create something, then any value for
    508``last_type`` other than ``LAST_NORM`` will result in an error.  For
    509example if ``path_parentat()`` reports ``LAST_DOTDOT``, then the caller
    510won't try to create that name.  They also check for trailing slashes
    511by testing ``last.name[last.len]``.  If there is any character beyond
    512the final component, it must be a trailing slash.
    513
    514Revalidation and automounts
    515---------------------------
    516
    517Apart from symbolic links, there are only two parts of the "REF-walk"
    518process not yet covered.  One is the handling of stale cache entries
    519and the other is automounts.
    520
    521On filesystems that require it, the lookup routines will call the
    522``->d_revalidate()`` dentry method to ensure that the cached information
    523is current.  This will often confirm validity or update a few details
    524from a server.  In some cases it may find that there has been change
    525further up the path and that something that was thought to be valid
    526previously isn't really.  When this happens the lookup of the whole
    527path is aborted and retried with the "``LOOKUP_REVAL``" flag set.  This
    528forces revalidation to be more thorough.  We will see more details of
    529this retry process in the next article.
    530
    531Automount points are locations in the filesystem where an attempt to
    532lookup a name can trigger changes to how that lookup should be
    533handled, in particular by mounting a filesystem there.  These are
    534covered in greater detail in autofs.txt in the Linux documentation
    535tree, but a few notes specifically related to path lookup are in order
    536here.
    537
    538The Linux VFS has a concept of "managed" dentries.  There are three
    539potentially interesting things about these dentries corresponding
    540to three different flags that might be set in ``dentry->d_flags``:
    541
    542``DCACHE_MANAGE_TRANSIT``
    543~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    544
    545If this flag has been set, then the filesystem has requested that the
    546``d_manage()`` dentry operation be called before handling any possible
    547mount point.  This can perform two particular services:
    548
    549It can block to avoid races.  If an automount point is being
    550unmounted, the ``d_manage()`` function will usually wait for that
    551process to complete before letting the new lookup proceed and possibly
    552trigger a new automount.
    553
    554It can selectively allow only some processes to transit through a
    555mount point.  When a server process is managing automounts, it may
    556need to access a directory without triggering normal automount
    557processing.  That server process can identify itself to the ``autofs``
    558filesystem, which will then give it a special pass through
    559``d_manage()`` by returning ``-EISDIR``.
    560
    561``DCACHE_MOUNTED``
    562~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    563
    564This flag is set on every dentry that is mounted on.  As Linux
    565supports multiple filesystem namespaces, it is possible that the
    566dentry may not be mounted on in *this* namespace, just in some
    567other.  So this flag is seen as a hint, not a promise.
    568
    569If this flag is set, and ``d_manage()`` didn't return ``-EISDIR``,
    570``lookup_mnt()`` is called to examine the mount hash table (honoring the
    571``mount_lock`` described earlier) and possibly return a new ``vfsmount``
    572and a new ``dentry`` (both with counted references).
    573
    574``DCACHE_NEED_AUTOMOUNT``
    575~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    576
    577If ``d_manage()`` allowed us to get this far, and ``lookup_mnt()`` didn't
    578find a mount point, then this flag causes the ``d_automount()`` dentry
    579operation to be called.
    580
    581The ``d_automount()`` operation can be arbitrarily complex and may
    582communicate with server processes etc. but it should ultimately either
    583report that there was an error, that there was nothing to mount, or
    584should provide an updated ``struct path`` with new ``dentry`` and ``vfsmount``.
    585
    586In the latter case, ``finish_automount()`` will be called to safely
    587install the new mount point into the mount table.
    588
    589There is no new locking of import here and it is important that no
    590locks (only counted references) are held over this processing due to
    591the very real possibility of extended delays.
    592This will become more important next time when we examine RCU-walk
    593which is particularly sensitive to delays.
    594
    595RCU-walk - faster pathname lookup in Linux
    596==========================================
    597
    598RCU-walk is another algorithm for performing pathname lookup in Linux.
    599It is in many ways similar to REF-walk and the two share quite a bit
    600of code.  The significant difference in RCU-walk is how it allows for
    601the possibility of concurrent access.
    602
    603We noted that REF-walk is complex because there are numerous details
    604and special cases.  RCU-walk reduces this complexity by simply
    605refusing to handle a number of cases -- it instead falls back to
    606REF-walk.  The difficulty with RCU-walk comes from a different
    607direction: unfamiliarity.  The locking rules when depending on RCU are
    608quite different from traditional locking, so we will spend a little extra
    609time when we come to those.
    610
    611Clear demarcation of roles
    612--------------------------
    613
    614The easiest way to manage concurrency is to forcibly stop any other
    615thread from changing the data structures that a given thread is
    616looking at.  In cases where no other thread would even think of
    617changing the data and lots of different threads want to read at the
    618same time, this can be very costly.  Even when using locks that permit
    619multiple concurrent readers, the simple act of updating the count of
    620the number of current readers can impose an unwanted cost.  So the
    621goal when reading a shared data structure that no other process is
    622changing is to avoid writing anything to memory at all.  Take no
    623locks, increment no counts, leave no footprints.
    624
    625The REF-walk mechanism already described certainly doesn't follow this
    626principle, but then it is really designed to work when there may well
    627be other threads modifying the data.  RCU-walk, in contrast, is
    628designed for the common situation where there are lots of frequent
    629readers and only occasional writers.  This may not be common in all
    630parts of the filesystem tree, but in many parts it will be.  For the
    631other parts it is important that RCU-walk can quickly fall back to
    632using REF-walk.
    633
    634Pathname lookup always starts in RCU-walk mode but only remains there
    635as long as what it is looking for is in the cache and is stable.  It
    636dances lightly down the cached filesystem image, leaving no footprints
    637and carefully watching where it is, to be sure it doesn't trip.  If it
    638notices that something has changed or is changing, or if something
    639isn't in the cache, then it tries to stop gracefully and switch to
    640REF-walk.
    641
    642This stopping requires getting a counted reference on the current
    643``vfsmount`` and ``dentry``, and ensuring that these are still valid -
    644that a path walk with REF-walk would have found the same entries.
    645This is an invariant that RCU-walk must guarantee.  It can only make
    646decisions, such as selecting the next step, that are decisions which
    647REF-walk could also have made if it were walking down the tree at the
    648same time.  If the graceful stop succeeds, the rest of the path is
    649processed with the reliable, if slightly sluggish, REF-walk.  If
    650RCU-walk finds it cannot stop gracefully, it simply gives up and
    651restarts from the top with REF-walk.
    652
    653This pattern of "try RCU-walk, if that fails try REF-walk" can be
    654clearly seen in functions like filename_lookup(),
    655filename_parentat(),
    656do_filp_open(), and do_file_open_root().  These four
    657correspond roughly to the three ``path_*()`` functions we met earlier,
    658each of which calls ``link_path_walk()``.  The ``path_*()`` functions are
    659called using different mode flags until a mode is found which works.
    660They are first called with ``LOOKUP_RCU`` set to request "RCU-walk".  If
    661that fails with the error ``ECHILD`` they are called again with no
    662special flag to request "REF-walk".  If either of those report the
    663error ``ESTALE`` a final attempt is made with ``LOOKUP_REVAL`` set (and no
    664``LOOKUP_RCU``) to ensure that entries found in the cache are forcibly
    665revalidated - normally entries are only revalidated if the filesystem
    666determines that they are too old to trust.
    667
    668The ``LOOKUP_RCU`` attempt may drop that flag internally and switch to
    669REF-walk, but will never then try to switch back to RCU-walk.  Places
    670that trip up RCU-walk are much more likely to be near the leaves and
    671so it is very unlikely that there will be much, if any, benefit from
    672switching back.
    673
    674RCU and seqlocks: fast and light
    675--------------------------------
    676
    677RCU is, unsurprisingly, critical to RCU-walk mode.  The
    678``rcu_read_lock()`` is held for the entire time that RCU-walk is walking
    679down a path.  The particular guarantee it provides is that the key
    680data structures - dentries, inodes, super_blocks, and mounts - will
    681not be freed while the lock is held.  They might be unlinked or
    682invalidated in one way or another, but the memory will not be
    683repurposed so values in various fields will still be meaningful.  This
    684is the only guarantee that RCU provides; everything else is done using
    685seqlocks.
    686
    687As we saw above, REF-walk holds a counted reference to the current
    688dentry and the current vfsmount, and does not release those references
    689before taking references to the "next" dentry or vfsmount.  It also
    690sometimes takes the ``d_lock`` spinlock.  These references and locks are
    691taken to prevent certain changes from happening.  RCU-walk must not
    692take those references or locks and so cannot prevent such changes.
    693Instead, it checks to see if a change has been made, and aborts or
    694retries if it has.
    695
    696To preserve the invariant mentioned above (that RCU-walk may only make
    697decisions that REF-walk could have made), it must make the checks at
    698or near the same places that REF-walk holds the references.  So, when
    699REF-walk increments a reference count or takes a spinlock, RCU-walk
    700samples the status of a seqlock using ``read_seqcount_begin()`` or a
    701similar function.  When REF-walk decrements the count or drops the
    702lock, RCU-walk checks if the sampled status is still valid using
    703``read_seqcount_retry()`` or similar.
    704
    705However, there is a little bit more to seqlocks than that.  If
    706RCU-walk accesses two different fields in a seqlock-protected
    707structure, or accesses the same field twice, there is no a priori
    708guarantee of any consistency between those accesses.  When consistency
    709is needed - which it usually is - RCU-walk must take a copy and then
    710use ``read_seqcount_retry()`` to validate that copy.
    711
    712``read_seqcount_retry()`` not only checks the sequence number, but also
    713imposes a memory barrier so that no memory-read instruction from
    714*before* the call can be delayed until *after* the call, either by the
    715CPU or by the compiler.  A simple example of this can be seen in
    716``slow_dentry_cmp()`` which, for filesystems which do not use simple
    717byte-wise name equality, calls into the filesystem to compare a name
    718against a dentry.  The length and name pointer are copied into local
    719variables, then ``read_seqcount_retry()`` is called to confirm the two
    720are consistent, and only then is ``->d_compare()`` called.  When
    721standard filename comparison is used, ``dentry_cmp()`` is called
    722instead.  Notably it does *not* use ``read_seqcount_retry()``, but
    723instead has a large comment explaining why the consistency guarantee
    724isn't necessary.  A subsequent ``read_seqcount_retry()`` will be
    725sufficient to catch any problem that could occur at this point.
    726
    727With that little refresher on seqlocks out of the way we can look at
    728the bigger picture of how RCU-walk uses seqlocks.
    729
    730``mount_lock`` and ``nd->m_seq``
    731~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    732
    733We already met the ``mount_lock`` seqlock when REF-walk used it to
    734ensure that crossing a mount point is performed safely.  RCU-walk uses
    735it for that too, but for quite a bit more.
    736
    737Instead of taking a counted reference to each ``vfsmount`` as it
    738descends the tree, RCU-walk samples the state of ``mount_lock`` at the
    739start of the walk and stores this initial sequence number in the
    740``struct nameidata`` in the ``m_seq`` field.  This one lock and one
    741sequence number are used to validate all accesses to all ``vfsmounts``,
    742and all mount point crossings.  As changes to the mount table are
    743relatively rare, it is reasonable to fall back on REF-walk any time
    744that any "mount" or "unmount" happens.
    745
    746``m_seq`` is checked (using ``read_seqretry()``) at the end of an RCU-walk
    747sequence, whether switching to REF-walk for the rest of the path or
    748when the end of the path is reached.  It is also checked when stepping
    749down over a mount point (in ``__follow_mount_rcu()``) or up (in
    750``follow_dotdot_rcu()``).  If it is ever found to have changed, the
    751whole RCU-walk sequence is aborted and the path is processed again by
    752REF-walk.
    753
    754If RCU-walk finds that ``mount_lock`` hasn't changed then it can be sure
    755that, had REF-walk taken counted references on each vfsmount, the
    756results would have been the same.  This ensures the invariant holds,
    757at least for vfsmount structures.
    758
    759``dentry->d_seq`` and ``nd->seq``
    760~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    761
    762In place of taking a count or lock on ``d_reflock``, RCU-walk samples
    763the per-dentry ``d_seq`` seqlock, and stores the sequence number in the
    764``seq`` field of the nameidata structure, so ``nd->seq`` should always be
    765the current sequence number of ``nd->dentry``.  This number needs to be
    766revalidated after copying, and before using, the name, parent, or
    767inode of the dentry.
    768
    769The handling of the name we have already looked at, and the parent is
    770only accessed in ``follow_dotdot_rcu()`` which fairly trivially follows
    771the required pattern, though it does so for three different cases.
    772
    773When not at a mount point, ``d_parent`` is followed and its ``d_seq`` is
    774collected.  When we are at a mount point, we instead follow the
    775``mnt->mnt_mountpoint`` link to get a new dentry and collect its
    776``d_seq``.  Then, after finally finding a ``d_parent`` to follow, we must
    777check if we have landed on a mount point and, if so, must find that
    778mount point and follow the ``mnt->mnt_root`` link.  This would imply a
    779somewhat unusual, but certainly possible, circumstance where the
    780starting point of the path lookup was in part of the filesystem that
    781was mounted on, and so not visible from the root.
    782
    783The inode pointer, stored in ``->d_inode``, is a little more
    784interesting.  The inode will always need to be accessed at least
    785twice, once to determine if it is NULL and once to verify access
    786permissions.  Symlink handling requires a validated inode pointer too.
    787Rather than revalidating on each access, a copy is made on the first
    788access and it is stored in the ``inode`` field of ``nameidata`` from where
    789it can be safely accessed without further validation.
    790
    791``lookup_fast()`` is the only lookup routine that is used in RCU-mode,
    792``lookup_slow()`` being too slow and requiring locks.  It is in
    793``lookup_fast()`` that we find the important "hand over hand" tracking
    794of the current dentry.
    795
    796The current ``dentry`` and current ``seq`` number are passed to
    797``__d_lookup_rcu()`` which, on success, returns a new ``dentry`` and a
    798new ``seq`` number.  ``lookup_fast()`` then copies the inode pointer and
    799revalidates the new ``seq`` number.  It then validates the old ``dentry``
    800with the old ``seq`` number one last time and only then continues.  This
    801process of getting the ``seq`` number of the new dentry and then
    802checking the ``seq`` number of the old exactly mirrors the process of
    803getting a counted reference to the new dentry before dropping that for
    804the old dentry which we saw in REF-walk.
    805
    806No ``inode->i_rwsem`` or even ``rename_lock``
    807~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    808
    809A semaphore is a fairly heavyweight lock that can only be taken when it is
    810permissible to sleep.  As ``rcu_read_lock()`` forbids sleeping,
    811``inode->i_rwsem`` plays no role in RCU-walk.  If some other thread does
    812take ``i_rwsem`` and modifies the directory in a way that RCU-walk needs
    813to notice, the result will be either that RCU-walk fails to find the
    814dentry that it is looking for, or it will find a dentry which
    815``read_seqretry()`` won't validate.  In either case it will drop down to
    816REF-walk mode which can take whatever locks are needed.
    817
    818Though ``rename_lock`` could be used by RCU-walk as it doesn't require
    819any sleeping, RCU-walk doesn't bother.  REF-walk uses ``rename_lock`` to
    820protect against the possibility of hash chains in the dcache changing
    821while they are being searched.  This can result in failing to find
    822something that actually is there.  When RCU-walk fails to find
    823something in the dentry cache, whether it is really there or not, it
    824already drops down to REF-walk and tries again with appropriate
    825locking.  This neatly handles all cases, so adding extra checks on
    826rename_lock would bring no significant value.
    827
    828``unlazy walk()`` and ``complete_walk()``
    829-----------------------------------------
    830
    831That "dropping down to REF-walk" typically involves a call to
    832``unlazy_walk()``, so named because "RCU-walk" is also sometimes
    833referred to as "lazy walk".  ``unlazy_walk()`` is called when
    834following the path down to the current vfsmount/dentry pair seems to
    835have proceeded successfully, but the next step is problematic.  This
    836can happen if the next name cannot be found in the dcache, if
    837permission checking or name revalidation couldn't be achieved while
    838the ``rcu_read_lock()`` is held (which forbids sleeping), if an
    839automount point is found, or in a couple of cases involving symlinks.
    840It is also called from ``complete_walk()`` when the lookup has reached
    841the final component, or the very end of the path, depending on which
    842particular flavor of lookup is used.
    843
    844Other reasons for dropping out of RCU-walk that do not trigger a call
    845to ``unlazy_walk()`` are when some inconsistency is found that cannot be
    846handled immediately, such as ``mount_lock`` or one of the ``d_seq``
    847seqlocks reporting a change.  In these cases the relevant function
    848will return ``-ECHILD`` which will percolate up until it triggers a new
    849attempt from the top using REF-walk.
    850
    851For those cases where ``unlazy_walk()`` is an option, it essentially
    852takes a reference on each of the pointers that it holds (vfsmount,
    853dentry, and possibly some symbolic links) and then verifies that the
    854relevant seqlocks have not been changed.  If there have been changes,
    855it, too, aborts with ``-ECHILD``, otherwise the transition to REF-walk
    856has been a success and the lookup process continues.
    857
    858Taking a reference on those pointers is not quite as simple as just
    859incrementing a counter.  That works to take a second reference if you
    860already have one (often indirectly through another object), but it
    861isn't sufficient if you don't actually have a counted reference at
    862all.  For ``dentry->d_lockref``, it is safe to increment the reference
    863counter to get a reference unless it has been explicitly marked as
    864"dead" which involves setting the counter to ``-128``.
    865``lockref_get_not_dead()`` achieves this.
    866
    867For ``mnt->mnt_count`` it is safe to take a reference as long as
    868``mount_lock`` is then used to validate the reference.  If that
    869validation fails, it may *not* be safe to just drop that reference in
    870the standard way of calling ``mnt_put()`` - an unmount may have
    871progressed too far.  So the code in ``legitimize_mnt()``, when it
    872finds that the reference it got might not be safe, checks the
    873``MNT_SYNC_UMOUNT`` flag to determine if a simple ``mnt_put()`` is
    874correct, or if it should just decrement the count and pretend none of
    875this ever happened.
    876
    877Taking care in filesystems
    878--------------------------
    879
    880RCU-walk depends almost entirely on cached information and often will
    881not call into the filesystem at all.  However there are two places,
    882besides the already-mentioned component-name comparison, where the
    883file system might be included in RCU-walk, and it must know to be
    884careful.
    885
    886If the filesystem has non-standard permission-checking requirements -
    887such as a networked filesystem which may need to check with the server
    888- the ``i_op->permission`` interface might be called during RCU-walk.
    889In this case an extra "``MAY_NOT_BLOCK``" flag is passed so that it
    890knows not to sleep, but to return ``-ECHILD`` if it cannot complete
    891promptly.  ``i_op->permission`` is given the inode pointer, not the
    892dentry, so it doesn't need to worry about further consistency checks.
    893However if it accesses any other filesystem data structures, it must
    894ensure they are safe to be accessed with only the ``rcu_read_lock()``
    895held.  This typically means they must be freed using ``kfree_rcu()`` or
    896similar.
    897
    898.. _READ_ONCE: https://lwn.net/Articles/624126/
    899
    900If the filesystem may need to revalidate dcache entries, then
    901``d_op->d_revalidate`` may be called in RCU-walk too.  This interface
    902*is* passed the dentry but does not have access to the ``inode`` or the
    903``seq`` number from the ``nameidata``, so it needs to be extra careful
    904when accessing fields in the dentry.  This "extra care" typically
    905involves using  `READ_ONCE() <READ_ONCE_>`_ to access fields, and verifying the
    906result is not NULL before using it.  This pattern can be seen in
    907``nfs_lookup_revalidate()``.
    908
    909A pair of patterns
    910------------------
    911
    912In various places in the details of REF-walk and RCU-walk, and also in
    913the big picture, there are a couple of related patterns that are worth
    914being aware of.
    915
    916The first is "try quickly and check, if that fails try slowly".  We
    917can see that in the high-level approach of first trying RCU-walk and
    918then trying REF-walk, and in places where ``unlazy_walk()`` is used to
    919switch to REF-walk for the rest of the path.  We also saw it earlier
    920in ``dget_parent()`` when following a "``..``" link.  It tries a quick way
    921to get a reference, then falls back to taking locks if needed.
    922
    923The second pattern is "try quickly and check, if that fails try
    924again - repeatedly".  This is seen with the use of ``rename_lock`` and
    925``mount_lock`` in REF-walk.  RCU-walk doesn't make use of this pattern -
    926if anything goes wrong it is much safer to just abort and try a more
    927sedate approach.
    928
    929The emphasis here is "try quickly and check".  It should probably be
    930"try quickly *and carefully*, then check".  The fact that checking is
    931needed is a reminder that the system is dynamic and only a limited
    932number of things are safe at all.  The most likely cause of errors in
    933this whole process is assuming something is safe when in reality it
    934isn't.  Careful consideration of what exactly guarantees the safety of
    935each access is sometimes necessary.
    936
    937A walk among the symlinks
    938=========================
    939
    940There are several basic issues that we will examine to understand the
    941handling of symbolic links:  the symlink stack, together with cache
    942lifetimes, will help us understand the overall recursive handling of
    943symlinks and lead to the special care needed for the final component.
    944Then a consideration of access-time updates and summary of the various
    945flags controlling lookup will finish the story.
    946
    947The symlink stack
    948-----------------
    949
    950There are only two sorts of filesystem objects that can usefully
    951appear in a path prior to the final component: directories and symlinks.
    952Handling directories is quite straightforward: the new directory
    953simply becomes the starting point at which to interpret the next
    954component on the path.  Handling symbolic links requires a bit more
    955work.
    956
    957Conceptually, symbolic links could be handled by editing the path.  If
    958a component name refers to a symbolic link, then that component is
    959replaced by the body of the link and, if that body starts with a '/',
    960then all preceding parts of the path are discarded.  This is what the
    961"``readlink -f``" command does, though it also edits out "``.``" and
    962"``..``" components.
    963
    964Directly editing the path string is not really necessary when looking
    965up a path, and discarding early components is pointless as they aren't
    966looked at anyway.  Keeping track of all remaining components is
    967important, but they can of course be kept separately; there is no need
    968to concatenate them.  As one symlink may easily refer to another,
    969which in turn can refer to a third, we may need to keep the remaining
    970components of several paths, each to be processed when the preceding
    971ones are completed.  These path remnants are kept on a stack of
    972limited size.
    973
    974There are two reasons for placing limits on how many symlinks can
    975occur in a single path lookup.  The most obvious is to avoid loops.
    976If a symlink referred to itself either directly or through
    977intermediaries, then following the symlink can never complete
    978successfully - the error ``ELOOP`` must be returned.  Loops can be
    979detected without imposing limits, but limits are the simplest solution
    980and, given the second reason for restriction, quite sufficient.
    981
    982.. _outlined recently: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1934390/focus=1934550
    983
    984The second reason was `outlined recently`_ by Linus:
    985
    986   Because it's a latency and DoS issue too. We need to react well to
    987   true loops, but also to "very deep" non-loops. It's not about memory
    988   use, it's about users triggering unreasonable CPU resources.
    989
    990Linux imposes a limit on the length of any pathname: ``PATH_MAX``, which
    991is 4096.  There are a number of reasons for this limit; not letting the
    992kernel spend too much time on just one path is one of them.  With
    993symbolic links you can effectively generate much longer paths so some
    994sort of limit is needed for the same reason.  Linux imposes a limit of
    995at most 40 (MAXSYMLINKS) symlinks in any one path lookup.  It previously imposed
    996a further limit of eight on the maximum depth of recursion, but that was
    997raised to 40 when a separate stack was implemented, so there is now
    998just the one limit.
    999
   1000The ``nameidata`` structure that we met in an earlier article contains a
   1001small stack that can be used to store the remaining part of up to two
   1002symlinks.  In many cases this will be sufficient.  If it isn't, a
   1003separate stack is allocated with room for 40 symlinks.  Pathname
   1004lookup will never exceed that stack as, once the 40th symlink is
   1005detected, an error is returned.
   1006
   1007It might seem that the name remnants are all that needs to be stored on
   1008this stack, but we need a bit more.  To see that, we need to move on to
   1009cache lifetimes.
   1010
   1011Storage and lifetime of cached symlinks
   1012---------------------------------------
   1013
   1014Like other filesystem resources, such as inodes and directory
   1015entries, symlinks are cached by Linux to avoid repeated costly access
   1016to external storage.  It is particularly important for RCU-walk to be
   1017able to find and temporarily hold onto these cached entries, so that
   1018it doesn't need to drop down into REF-walk.
   1019
   1020.. _object-oriented design pattern: https://lwn.net/Articles/446317/
   1021
   1022While each filesystem is free to make its own choice, symlinks are
   1023typically stored in one of two places.  Short symlinks are often
   1024stored directly in the inode.  When a filesystem allocates a ``struct
   1025inode`` it typically allocates extra space to store private data (a
   1026common `object-oriented design pattern`_ in the kernel).  This will
   1027sometimes include space for a symlink.  The other common location is
   1028in the page cache, which normally stores the content of files.  The
   1029pathname in a symlink can be seen as the content of that symlink and
   1030can easily be stored in the page cache just like file content.
   1031
   1032When neither of these is suitable, the next most likely scenario is
   1033that the filesystem will allocate some temporary memory and copy or
   1034construct the symlink content into that memory whenever it is needed.
   1035
   1036When the symlink is stored in the inode, it has the same lifetime as
   1037the inode which, itself, is protected by RCU or by a counted reference
   1038on the dentry.  This means that the mechanisms that pathname lookup
   1039uses to access the dcache and icache (inode cache) safely are quite
   1040sufficient for accessing some cached symlinks safely.  In these cases,
   1041the ``i_link`` pointer in the inode is set to point to wherever the
   1042symlink is stored and it can be accessed directly whenever needed.
   1043
   1044When the symlink is stored in the page cache or elsewhere, the
   1045situation is not so straightforward.  A reference on a dentry or even
   1046on an inode does not imply any reference on cached pages of that
   1047inode, and even an ``rcu_read_lock()`` is not sufficient to ensure that
   1048a page will not disappear.  So for these symlinks the pathname lookup
   1049code needs to ask the filesystem to provide a stable reference and,
   1050significantly, needs to release that reference when it is finished
   1051with it.
   1052
   1053Taking a reference to a cache page is often possible even in RCU-walk
   1054mode.  It does require making changes to memory, which is best avoided,
   1055but that isn't necessarily a big cost and it is better than dropping
   1056out of RCU-walk mode completely.  Even filesystems that allocate
   1057space to copy the symlink into can use ``GFP_ATOMIC`` to often successfully
   1058allocate memory without the need to drop out of RCU-walk.  If a
   1059filesystem cannot successfully get a reference in RCU-walk mode, it
   1060must return ``-ECHILD`` and ``unlazy_walk()`` will be called to return to
   1061REF-walk mode in which the filesystem is allowed to sleep.
   1062
   1063The place for all this to happen is the ``i_op->get_link()`` inode
   1064method. This is called both in RCU-walk and REF-walk. In RCU-walk the
   1065``dentry*`` argument is NULL, ``->get_link()`` can return -ECHILD to drop out of
   1066RCU-walk.  Much like the ``i_op->permission()`` method we
   1067looked at previously, ``->get_link()`` would need to be careful that
   1068all the data structures it references are safe to be accessed while
   1069holding no counted reference, only the RCU lock. A callback
   1070``struct delayed_called`` will be passed to ``->get_link()``:
   1071file systems can set their own put_link function and argument through
   1072set_delayed_call(). Later on, when VFS wants to put link, it will call
   1073do_delayed_call() to invoke that callback function with the argument.
   1074
   1075In order for the reference to each symlink to be dropped when the walk completes,
   1076whether in RCU-walk or REF-walk, the symlink stack needs to contain,
   1077along with the path remnants:
   1078
   1079- the ``struct path`` to provide a reference to the previous path
   1080- the ``const char *`` to provide a reference to the to previous name
   1081- the ``seq`` to allow the path to be safely switched from RCU-walk to REF-walk
   1082- the ``struct delayed_call`` for later invocation.
   1083
   1084This means that each entry in the symlink stack needs to hold five
   1085pointers and an integer instead of just one pointer (the path
   1086remnant).  On a 64-bit system, this is about 40 bytes per entry;
   1087with 40 entries it adds up to 1600 bytes total, which is less than
   1088half a page.  So it might seem like a lot, but is by no means
   1089excessive.
   1090
   1091Note that, in a given stack frame, the path remnant (``name``) is not
   1092part of the symlink that the other fields refer to.  It is the remnant
   1093to be followed once that symlink has been fully parsed.
   1094
   1095Following the symlink
   1096---------------------
   1097
   1098The main loop in ``link_path_walk()`` iterates seamlessly over all
   1099components in the path and all of the non-final symlinks.  As symlinks
   1100are processed, the ``name`` pointer is adjusted to point to a new
   1101symlink, or is restored from the stack, so that much of the loop
   1102doesn't need to notice.  Getting this ``name`` variable on and off the
   1103stack is very straightforward; pushing and popping the references is
   1104a little more complex.
   1105
   1106When a symlink is found, walk_component() calls pick_link() via step_into()
   1107which returns the link from the filesystem.
   1108Providing that operation is successful, the old path ``name`` is placed on the
   1109stack, and the new value is used as the ``name`` for a while.  When the end of
   1110the path is found (i.e. ``*name`` is ``'\0'``) the old ``name`` is restored
   1111off the stack and path walking continues.
   1112
   1113Pushing and popping the reference pointers (inode, cookie, etc.) is more
   1114complex in part because of the desire to handle tail recursion.  When
   1115the last component of a symlink itself points to a symlink, we
   1116want to pop the symlink-just-completed off the stack before pushing
   1117the symlink-just-found to avoid leaving empty path remnants that would
   1118just get in the way.
   1119
   1120It is most convenient to push the new symlink references onto the
   1121stack in ``walk_component()`` immediately when the symlink is found;
   1122``walk_component()`` is also the last piece of code that needs to look at the
   1123old symlink as it walks that last component.  So it is quite
   1124convenient for ``walk_component()`` to release the old symlink and pop
   1125the references just before pushing the reference information for the
   1126new symlink.  It is guided in this by three flags: ``WALK_NOFOLLOW`` which
   1127forbids it from following a symlink if it finds one, ``WALK_MORE``
   1128which indicates that it is yet too early to release the
   1129current symlink, and ``WALK_TRAILING`` which indicates that it is on the final
   1130component of the lookup, so we will check userspace flag ``LOOKUP_FOLLOW`` to
   1131decide whether follow it when it is a symlink and call ``may_follow_link()`` to
   1132check if we have privilege to follow it.
   1133
   1134Symlinks with no final component
   1135~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   1136
   1137A pair of special-case symlinks deserve a little further explanation.
   1138Both result in a new ``struct path`` (with mount and dentry) being set
   1139up in the ``nameidata``, and result in pick_link() returning ``NULL``.
   1140
   1141The more obvious case is a symlink to "``/``".  All symlinks starting
   1142with "``/``" are detected in pick_link() which resets the ``nameidata``
   1143to point to the effective filesystem root.  If the symlink only
   1144contains "``/``" then there is nothing more to do, no components at all,
   1145so ``NULL`` is returned to indicate that the symlink can be released and
   1146the stack frame discarded.
   1147
   1148The other case involves things in ``/proc`` that look like symlinks but
   1149aren't really (and are therefore commonly referred to as "magic-links")::
   1150
   1151     $ ls -l /proc/self/fd/1
   1152     lrwx------ 1 neilb neilb 64 Jun 13 10:19 /proc/self/fd/1 -> /dev/pts/4
   1153
   1154Every open file descriptor in any process is represented in ``/proc`` by
   1155something that looks like a symlink.  It is really a reference to the
   1156target file, not just the name of it.  When you ``readlink`` these
   1157objects you get a name that might refer to the same file - unless it
   1158has been unlinked or mounted over.  When ``walk_component()`` follows
   1159one of these, the ``->get_link()`` method in "procfs" doesn't return
   1160a string name, but instead calls nd_jump_link() which updates the
   1161``nameidata`` in place to point to that target.  ``->get_link()`` then
   1162returns ``NULL``.  Again there is no final component and pick_link()
   1163returns ``NULL``.
   1164
   1165Following the symlink in the final component
   1166--------------------------------------------
   1167
   1168All this leads to ``link_path_walk()`` walking down every component, and
   1169following all symbolic links it finds, until it reaches the final
   1170component.  This is just returned in the ``last`` field of ``nameidata``.
   1171For some callers, this is all they need; they want to create that
   1172``last`` name if it doesn't exist or give an error if it does.  Other
   1173callers will want to follow a symlink if one is found, and possibly
   1174apply special handling to the last component of that symlink, rather
   1175than just the last component of the original file name.  These callers
   1176potentially need to call ``link_path_walk()`` again and again on
   1177successive symlinks until one is found that doesn't point to another
   1178symlink.
   1179
   1180This case is handled by relevant callers of link_path_walk(), such as
   1181path_lookupat(), path_openat() using a loop that calls link_path_walk(),
   1182and then handles the final component by calling open_last_lookups() or
   1183lookup_last(). If it is a symlink that needs to be followed,
   1184open_last_lookups() or lookup_last() will set things up properly and
   1185return the path so that the loop repeats, calling
   1186link_path_walk() again.  This could loop as many as 40 times if the last
   1187component of each symlink is another symlink.
   1188
   1189Of the various functions that examine the final component, 
   1190open_last_lookups() is the most interesting as it works in tandem
   1191with do_open() for opening a file.  Part of open_last_lookups() runs
   1192with ``i_rwsem`` held and this part is in a separate function: lookup_open().
   1193
   1194Explaining open_last_lookups() and do_open() completely is beyond the scope
   1195of this article, but a few highlights should help those interested in exploring
   1196the code.
   1197
   11981. Rather than just finding the target file, do_open() is used after
   1199   open_last_lookup() to open
   1200   it.  If the file was found in the dcache, then ``vfs_open()`` is used for
   1201   this.  If not, then ``lookup_open()`` will either call ``atomic_open()`` (if
   1202   the filesystem provides it) to combine the final lookup with the open, or
   1203   will perform the separate ``i_op->lookup()`` and ``i_op->create()`` steps
   1204   directly.  In the later case the actual "open" of this newly found or
   1205   created file will be performed by vfs_open(), just as if the name
   1206   were found in the dcache.
   1207
   12082. vfs_open() can fail with ``-EOPENSTALE`` if the cached information
   1209   wasn't quite current enough.  If it's in RCU-walk ``-ECHILD`` will be returned
   1210   otherwise ``-ESTALE`` is returned.  When ``-ESTALE`` is returned, the caller may
   1211   retry with ``LOOKUP_REVAL`` flag set.
   1212
   12133. An open with O_CREAT **does** follow a symlink in the final component,
   1214   unlike other creation system calls (like ``mkdir``).  So the sequence::
   1215
   1216          ln -s bar /tmp/foo
   1217          echo hello > /tmp/foo
   1218
   1219   will create a file called ``/tmp/bar``.  This is not permitted if
   1220   ``O_EXCL`` is set but otherwise is handled for an O_CREAT open much
   1221   like for a non-creating open: lookup_last() or open_last_lookup()
   1222   returns a non ``NULL`` value, and link_path_walk() gets called and the
   1223   open process continues on the symlink that was found.
   1224
   1225Updating the access time
   1226------------------------
   1227
   1228We previously said of RCU-walk that it would "take no locks, increment
   1229no counts, leave no footprints."  We have since seen that some
   1230"footprints" can be needed when handling symlinks as a counted
   1231reference (or even a memory allocation) may be needed.  But these
   1232footprints are best kept to a minimum.
   1233
   1234One other place where walking down a symlink can involve leaving
   1235footprints in a way that doesn't affect directories is in updating access times.
   1236In Unix (and Linux) every filesystem object has a "last accessed
   1237time", or "``atime``".  Passing through a directory to access a file
   1238within is not considered to be an access for the purposes of
   1239``atime``; only listing the contents of a directory can update its ``atime``.
   1240Symlinks are different it seems.  Both reading a symlink (with ``readlink()``)
   1241and looking up a symlink on the way to some other destination can
   1242update the atime on that symlink.
   1243
   1244.. _clearest statement: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_08
   1245
   1246It is not clear why this is the case; POSIX has little to say on the
   1247subject.  The `clearest statement`_ is that, if a particular implementation
   1248updates a timestamp in a place not specified by POSIX, this must be
   1249documented "except that any changes caused by pathname resolution need
   1250not be documented".  This seems to imply that POSIX doesn't really
   1251care about access-time updates during pathname lookup.
   1252
   1253.. _Linux 1.3.87: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/history/history.git/diff/fs/ext2/symlink.c?id=f806c6db77b8eaa6e00dcfb6b567706feae8dbb8
   1254
   1255An examination of history shows that prior to `Linux 1.3.87`_, the ext2
   1256filesystem, at least, didn't update atime when following a link.
   1257Unfortunately we have no record of why that behavior was changed.
   1258
   1259In any case, access time must now be updated and that operation can be
   1260quite complex.  Trying to stay in RCU-walk while doing it is best
   1261avoided.  Fortunately it is often permitted to skip the ``atime``
   1262update.  Because ``atime`` updates cause performance problems in various
   1263areas, Linux supports the ``relatime`` mount option, which generally
   1264limits the updates of ``atime`` to once per day on files that aren't
   1265being changed (and symlinks never change once created).  Even without
   1266``relatime``, many filesystems record ``atime`` with a one-second
   1267granularity, so only one update per second is required.
   1268
   1269It is easy to test if an ``atime`` update is needed while in RCU-walk
   1270mode and, if it isn't, the update can be skipped and RCU-walk mode
   1271continues.  Only when an ``atime`` update is actually required does the
   1272path walk drop down to REF-walk.  All of this is handled in the
   1273``get_link()`` function.
   1274
   1275A few flags
   1276-----------
   1277
   1278A suitable way to wrap up this tour of pathname walking is to list
   1279the various flags that can be stored in the ``nameidata`` to guide the
   1280lookup process.  Many of these are only meaningful on the final
   1281component, others reflect the current state of the pathname lookup, and some
   1282apply restrictions to all path components encountered in the path lookup.
   1283
   1284And then there is ``LOOKUP_EMPTY``, which doesn't fit conceptually with
   1285the others.  If this is not set, an empty pathname causes an error
   1286very early on.  If it is set, empty pathnames are not considered to be
   1287an error.
   1288
   1289Global state flags
   1290~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   1291
   1292We have already met two global state flags: ``LOOKUP_RCU`` and
   1293``LOOKUP_REVAL``.  These select between one of three overall approaches
   1294to lookup: RCU-walk, REF-walk, and REF-walk with forced revalidation.
   1295
   1296``LOOKUP_PARENT`` indicates that the final component hasn't been reached
   1297yet.  This is primarily used to tell the audit subsystem the full
   1298context of a particular access being audited.
   1299
   1300``ND_ROOT_PRESET`` indicates that the ``root`` field in the ``nameidata`` was
   1301provided by the caller, so it shouldn't be released when it is no
   1302longer needed.
   1303
   1304``ND_JUMPED`` means that the current dentry was chosen not because
   1305it had the right name but for some other reason.  This happens when
   1306following "``..``", following a symlink to ``/``, crossing a mount point
   1307or accessing a "``/proc/$PID/fd/$FD``" symlink (also known as a "magic
   1308link"). In this case the filesystem has not been asked to revalidate the
   1309name (with ``d_revalidate()``).  In such cases the inode may still need
   1310to be revalidated, so ``d_op->d_weak_revalidate()`` is called if
   1311``ND_JUMPED`` is set when the look completes - which may be at the
   1312final component or, when creating, unlinking, or renaming, at the penultimate component.
   1313
   1314Resolution-restriction flags
   1315~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   1316
   1317In order to allow userspace to protect itself against certain race conditions
   1318and attack scenarios involving changing path components, a series of flags are
   1319available which apply restrictions to all path components encountered during
   1320path lookup. These flags are exposed through ``openat2()``'s ``resolve`` field.
   1321
   1322``LOOKUP_NO_SYMLINKS`` blocks all symlink traversals (including magic-links).
   1323This is distinctly different from ``LOOKUP_FOLLOW``, because the latter only
   1324relates to restricting the following of trailing symlinks.
   1325
   1326``LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS`` blocks all magic-link traversals. Filesystems must
   1327ensure that they return errors from ``nd_jump_link()``, because that is how
   1328``LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS`` and other magic-link restrictions are implemented.
   1329
   1330``LOOKUP_NO_XDEV`` blocks all ``vfsmount`` traversals (this includes both
   1331bind-mounts and ordinary mounts). Note that the ``vfsmount`` which contains the
   1332lookup is determined by the first mountpoint the path lookup reaches --
   1333absolute paths start with the ``vfsmount`` of ``/``, and relative paths start
   1334with the ``dfd``'s ``vfsmount``. Magic-links are only permitted if the
   1335``vfsmount`` of the path is unchanged.
   1336
   1337``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` blocks any path components which resolve outside the
   1338starting point of the resolution. This is done by blocking ``nd_jump_root()``
   1339as well as blocking ".." if it would jump outside the starting point.
   1340``rename_lock`` and ``mount_lock`` are used to detect attacks against the
   1341resolution of "..". Magic-links are also blocked.
   1342
   1343``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` resolves all path components as though the starting point
   1344were the filesystem root. ``nd_jump_root()`` brings the resolution back to
   1345the starting point, and ".." at the starting point will act as a no-op. As with
   1346``LOOKUP_BENEATH``, ``rename_lock`` and ``mount_lock`` are used to detect
   1347attacks against ".." resolution. Magic-links are also blocked.
   1348
   1349Final-component flags
   1350~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   1351
   1352Some of these flags are only set when the final component is being
   1353considered.  Others are only checked for when considering that final
   1354component.
   1355
   1356``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT`` ensures that, if the final component is an automount
   1357point, then the mount is triggered.  Some operations would trigger it
   1358anyway, but operations like ``stat()`` deliberately don't.  ``statfs()``
   1359needs to trigger the mount but otherwise behaves a lot like ``stat()``, so
   1360it sets ``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT``, as does "``quotactl()``" and the handling of
   1361"``mount --bind``".
   1362
   1363``LOOKUP_FOLLOW`` has a similar function to ``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT`` but for
   1364symlinks.  Some system calls set or clear it implicitly, while
   1365others have API flags such as ``AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW`` and
   1366``UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW`` to control it.  Its effect is similar to
   1367``WALK_GET`` that we already met, but it is used in a different way.
   1368
   1369``LOOKUP_DIRECTORY`` insists that the final component is a directory.
   1370Various callers set this and it is also set when the final component
   1371is found to be followed by a slash.
   1372
   1373Finally ``LOOKUP_OPEN``, ``LOOKUP_CREATE``, ``LOOKUP_EXCL``, and
   1374``LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET`` are not used directly by the VFS but are made
   1375available to the filesystem and particularly the ``->d_revalidate()``
   1376method.  A filesystem can choose not to bother revalidating too hard
   1377if it knows that it will be asked to open or create the file soon.
   1378These flags were previously useful for ``->lookup()`` too but with the
   1379introduction of ``->atomic_open()`` they are less relevant there.
   1380
   1381End of the road
   1382---------------
   1383
   1384Despite its complexity, all this pathname lookup code appears to be
   1385in good shape - various parts are certainly easier to understand now
   1386than even a couple of releases ago.  But that doesn't mean it is
   1387"finished".   As already mentioned, RCU-walk currently only follows
   1388symlinks that are stored in the inode so, while it handles many ext4
   1389symlinks, it doesn't help with NFS, XFS, or Btrfs.  That support
   1390is not likely to be long delayed.