cachepc-linux

credentials.rst (21162B)

====================
Credentials in Linux
====================

By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

.. contents:: :local:

Overview
========

There are several parts to the security check performed by Linux when one
object acts upon another:

 1. Objects.

     Objects are things in the system that may be acted upon directly by
     userspace programs.  Linux has a variety of actionable objects, including:

	- Tasks
	- Files/inodes
	- Sockets
	- Message queues
	- Shared memory segments
	- Semaphores
	- Keys

     As a part of the description of all these objects there is a set of
     credentials.  What's in the set depends on the type of object.

 2. Object ownership.

     Amongst the credentials of most objects, there will be a subset that
     indicates the ownership of that object.  This is used for resource
     accounting and limitation (disk quotas and task rlimits for example).

     In a standard UNIX filesystem, for instance, this will be defined by the
     UID marked on the inode.

 3. The objective context.

     Also amongst the credentials of those objects, there will be a subset that
     indicates the 'objective context' of that object.  This may or may not be
     the same set as in (2) - in standard UNIX files, for instance, this is the
     defined by the UID and the GID marked on the inode.

     The objective context is used as part of the security calculation that is
     carried out when an object is acted upon.

 4. Subjects.

     A subject is an object that is acting upon another object.

     Most of the objects in the system are inactive: they don't act on other
     objects within the system.  Processes/tasks are the obvious exception:
     they do stuff; they access and manipulate things.

     Objects other than tasks may under some circumstances also be subjects.
     For instance an open file may send SIGIO to a task using the UID and EUID
     given to it by a task that called ``fcntl(F_SETOWN)`` upon it.  In this case,
     the file struct will have a subjective context too.

 5. The subjective context.

     A subject has an additional interpretation of its credentials.  A subset
     of its credentials forms the 'subjective context'.  The subjective context
     is used as part of the security calculation that is carried out when a
     subject acts.

     A Linux task, for example, has the FSUID, FSGID and the supplementary
     group list for when it is acting upon a file - which are quite separate
     from the real UID and GID that normally form the objective context of the
     task.

 6. Actions.

     Linux has a number of actions available that a subject may perform upon an
     object.  The set of actions available depends on the nature of the subject
     and the object.

     Actions include reading, writing, creating and deleting files; forking or
     signalling and tracing tasks.

 7. Rules, access control lists and security calculations.

     When a subject acts upon an object, a security calculation is made.  This
     involves taking the subjective context, the objective context and the
     action, and searching one or more sets of rules to see whether the subject
     is granted or denied permission to act in the desired manner on the
     object, given those contexts.

     There are two main sources of rules:

     a. Discretionary access control (DAC):

	 Sometimes the object will include sets of rules as part of its
	 description.  This is an 'Access Control List' or 'ACL'.  A Linux
	 file may supply more than one ACL.

	 A traditional UNIX file, for example, includes a permissions mask that
	 is an abbreviated ACL with three fixed classes of subject ('user',
	 'group' and 'other'), each of which may be granted certain privileges
	 ('read', 'write' and 'execute' - whatever those map to for the object
	 in question).  UNIX file permissions do not allow the arbitrary
	 specification of subjects, however, and so are of limited use.

	 A Linux file might also sport a POSIX ACL.  This is a list of rules
	 that grants various permissions to arbitrary subjects.

     b. Mandatory access control (MAC):

	 The system as a whole may have one or more sets of rules that get
	 applied to all subjects and objects, regardless of their source.
	 SELinux and Smack are examples of this.

	 In the case of SELinux and Smack, each object is given a label as part
	 of its credentials.  When an action is requested, they take the
	 subject label, the object label and the action and look for a rule
	 that says that this action is either granted or denied.


Types of Credentials
====================

The Linux kernel supports the following types of credentials:

 1. Traditional UNIX credentials.

	- Real User ID
	- Real Group ID

     The UID and GID are carried by most, if not all, Linux objects, even if in
     some cases it has to be invented (FAT or CIFS files for example, which are
     derived from Windows).  These (mostly) define the objective context of
     that object, with tasks being slightly different in some cases.

	- Effective, Saved and FS User ID
	- Effective, Saved and FS Group ID
	- Supplementary groups

     These are additional credentials used by tasks only.  Usually, an
     EUID/EGID/GROUPS will be used as the subjective context, and real UID/GID
     will be used as the objective.  For tasks, it should be noted that this is
     not always true.

 2. Capabilities.

	- Set of permitted capabilities
	- Set of inheritable capabilities
	- Set of effective capabilities
	- Capability bounding set

     These are only carried by tasks.  They indicate superior capabilities
     granted piecemeal to a task that an ordinary task wouldn't otherwise have.
     These are manipulated implicitly by changes to the traditional UNIX
     credentials, but can also be manipulated directly by the ``capset()``
     system call.

     The permitted capabilities are those caps that the process might grant
     itself to its effective or permitted sets through ``capset()``.  This
     inheritable set might also be so constrained.

     The effective capabilities are the ones that a task is actually allowed to
     make use of itself.

     The inheritable capabilities are the ones that may get passed across
     ``execve()``.

     The bounding set limits the capabilities that may be inherited across
     ``execve()``, especially when a binary is executed that will execute as
     UID 0.

 3. Secure management flags (securebits).

     These are only carried by tasks.  These govern the way the above
     credentials are manipulated and inherited over certain operations such as
     execve().  They aren't used directly as objective or subjective
     credentials.

 4. Keys and keyrings.

     These are only carried by tasks.  They carry and cache security tokens
     that don't fit into the other standard UNIX credentials.  They are for
     making such things as network filesystem keys available to the file
     accesses performed by processes, without the necessity of ordinary
     programs having to know about security details involved.

     Keyrings are a special type of key.  They carry sets of other keys and can
     be searched for the desired key.  Each process may subscribe to a number
     of keyrings:

	Per-thread keying
	Per-process keyring
	Per-session keyring

     When a process accesses a key, if not already present, it will normally be
     cached on one of these keyrings for future accesses to find.

     For more information on using keys, see ``Documentation/security/keys/*``.

 5. LSM

     The Linux Security Module allows extra controls to be placed over the
     operations that a task may do.  Currently Linux supports several LSM
     options.

     Some work by labelling the objects in a system and then applying sets of
     rules (policies) that say what operations a task with one label may do to
     an object with another label.

 6. AF_KEY

     This is a socket-based approach to credential management for networking
     stacks [RFC 2367].  It isn't discussed by this document as it doesn't
     interact directly with task and file credentials; rather it keeps system
     level credentials.


When a file is opened, part of the opening task's subjective context is
recorded in the file struct created.  This allows operations using that file
struct to use those credentials instead of the subjective context of the task
that issued the operation.  An example of this would be a file opened on a
network filesystem where the credentials of the opened file should be presented
to the server, regardless of who is actually doing a read or a write upon it.


File Markings
=============

Files on disk or obtained over the network may have annotations that form the
objective security context of that file.  Depending on the type of filesystem,
this may include one or more of the following:

 * UNIX UID, GID, mode;
 * Windows user ID;
 * Access control list;
 * LSM security label;
 * UNIX exec privilege escalation bits (SUID/SGID);
 * File capabilities exec privilege escalation bits.

These are compared to the task's subjective security context, and certain
operations allowed or disallowed as a result.  In the case of execve(), the
privilege escalation bits come into play, and may allow the resulting process
extra privileges, based on the annotations on the executable file.


Task Credentials
================

In Linux, all of a task's credentials are held in (uid, gid) or through
(groups, keys, LSM security) a refcounted structure of type 'struct cred'.
Each task points to its credentials by a pointer called 'cred' in its
task_struct.

Once a set of credentials has been prepared and committed, it may not be
changed, barring the following exceptions:

 1. its reference count may be changed;

 2. the reference count on the group_info struct it points to may be changed;

 3. the reference count on the security data it points to may be changed;

 4. the reference count on any keyrings it points to may be changed;

 5. any keyrings it points to may be revoked, expired or have their security
    attributes changed; and

 6. the contents of any keyrings to which it points may be changed (the whole
    point of keyrings being a shared set of credentials, modifiable by anyone
    with appropriate access).

To alter anything in the cred struct, the copy-and-replace principle must be
adhered to.  First take a copy, then alter the copy and then use RCU to change
the task pointer to make it point to the new copy.  There are wrappers to aid
with this (see below).

A task may only alter its _own_ credentials; it is no longer permitted for a
task to alter another's credentials.  This means the ``capset()`` system call
is no longer permitted to take any PID other than the one of the current
process. Also ``keyctl_instantiate()`` and ``keyctl_negate()`` functions no
longer permit attachment to process-specific keyrings in the requesting
process as the instantiating process may need to create them.


Immutable Credentials
---------------------

Once a set of credentials has been made public (by calling ``commit_creds()``
for example), it must be considered immutable, barring two exceptions:

 1. The reference count may be altered.

 2. While the keyring subscriptions of a set of credentials may not be
    changed, the keyrings subscribed to may have their contents altered.

To catch accidental credential alteration at compile time, struct task_struct
has _const_ pointers to its credential sets, as does struct file.  Furthermore,
certain functions such as ``get_cred()`` and ``put_cred()`` operate on const
pointers, thus rendering casts unnecessary, but require to temporarily ditch
the const qualification to be able to alter the reference count.


Accessing Task Credentials
--------------------------

A task being able to alter only its own credentials permits the current process
to read or replace its own credentials without the need for any form of locking
-- which simplifies things greatly.  It can just call::

	const struct cred *current_cred()

to get a pointer to its credentials structure, and it doesn't have to release
it afterwards.

There are convenience wrappers for retrieving specific aspects of a task's
credentials (the value is simply returned in each case)::

	uid_t current_uid(void)		Current's real UID
	gid_t current_gid(void)		Current's real GID
	uid_t current_euid(void)	Current's effective UID
	gid_t current_egid(void)	Current's effective GID
	uid_t current_fsuid(void)	Current's file access UID
	gid_t current_fsgid(void)	Current's file access GID
	kernel_cap_t current_cap(void)	Current's effective capabilities
	struct user_struct *current_user(void)  Current's user account

There are also convenience wrappers for retrieving specific associated pairs of
a task's credentials::

	void current_uid_gid(uid_t *, gid_t *);
	void current_euid_egid(uid_t *, gid_t *);
	void current_fsuid_fsgid(uid_t *, gid_t *);

which return these pairs of values through their arguments after retrieving
them from the current task's credentials.


In addition, there is a function for obtaining a reference on the current
process's current set of credentials::

	const struct cred *get_current_cred(void);

and functions for getting references to one of the credentials that don't
actually live in struct cred::

	struct user_struct *get_current_user(void);
	struct group_info *get_current_groups(void);

which get references to the current process's user accounting structure and
supplementary groups list respectively.

Once a reference has been obtained, it must be released with ``put_cred()``,
``free_uid()`` or ``put_group_info()`` as appropriate.


Accessing Another Task's Credentials
------------------------------------

While a task may access its own credentials without the need for locking, the
same is not true of a task wanting to access another task's credentials.  It
must use the RCU read lock and ``rcu_dereference()``.

The ``rcu_dereference()`` is wrapped by::

	const struct cred *__task_cred(struct task_struct *task);

This should be used inside the RCU read lock, as in the following example::

	void foo(struct task_struct *t, struct foo_data *f)
	{
		const struct cred *tcred;
		...
		rcu_read_lock();
		tcred = __task_cred(t);
		f->uid = tcred->uid;
		f->gid = tcred->gid;
		f->groups = get_group_info(tcred->groups);
		rcu_read_unlock();
		...
	}

Should it be necessary to hold another task's credentials for a long period of
time, and possibly to sleep while doing so, then the caller should get a
reference on them using::

	const struct cred *get_task_cred(struct task_struct *task);

This does all the RCU magic inside of it.  The caller must call put_cred() on
the credentials so obtained when they're finished with.

.. note::
   The result of ``__task_cred()`` should not be passed directly to
   ``get_cred()`` as this may race with ``commit_cred()``.

There are a couple of convenience functions to access bits of another task's
credentials, hiding the RCU magic from the caller::

	uid_t task_uid(task)		Task's real UID
	uid_t task_euid(task)		Task's effective UID

If the caller is holding the RCU read lock at the time anyway, then::

	__task_cred(task)->uid
	__task_cred(task)->euid

should be used instead.  Similarly, if multiple aspects of a task's credentials
need to be accessed, RCU read lock should be used, ``__task_cred()`` called,
the result stored in a temporary pointer and then the credential aspects called
from that before dropping the lock.  This prevents the potentially expensive
RCU magic from being invoked multiple times.

Should some other single aspect of another task's credentials need to be
accessed, then this can be used::

	task_cred_xxx(task, member)

where 'member' is a non-pointer member of the cred struct.  For instance::

	uid_t task_cred_xxx(task, suid);

will retrieve 'struct cred::suid' from the task, doing the appropriate RCU
magic.  This may not be used for pointer members as what they point to may
disappear the moment the RCU read lock is dropped.


Altering Credentials
--------------------

As previously mentioned, a task may only alter its own credentials, and may not
alter those of another task.  This means that it doesn't need to use any
locking to alter its own credentials.

To alter the current process's credentials, a function should first prepare a
new set of credentials by calling::

	struct cred *prepare_creds(void);

this locks current->cred_replace_mutex and then allocates and constructs a
duplicate of the current process's credentials, returning with the mutex still
held if successful.  It returns NULL if not successful (out of memory).

The mutex prevents ``ptrace()`` from altering the ptrace state of a process
while security checks on credentials construction and changing is taking place
as the ptrace state may alter the outcome, particularly in the case of
``execve()``.

The new credentials set should be altered appropriately, and any security
checks and hooks done.  Both the current and the proposed sets of credentials
are available for this purpose as current_cred() will return the current set
still at this point.

When replacing the group list, the new list must be sorted before it
is added to the credential, as a binary search is used to test for
membership.  In practice, this means groups_sort() should be
called before set_groups() or set_current_groups().
groups_sort() must not be called on a ``struct group_list`` which
is shared as it may permute elements as part of the sorting process
even if the array is already sorted.

When the credential set is ready, it should be committed to the current process
by calling::

	int commit_creds(struct cred *new);

This will alter various aspects of the credentials and the process, giving the
LSM a chance to do likewise, then it will use ``rcu_assign_pointer()`` to
actually commit the new credentials to ``current->cred``, it will release
``current->cred_replace_mutex`` to allow ``ptrace()`` to take place, and it
will notify the scheduler and others of the changes.

This function is guaranteed to return 0, so that it can be tail-called at the
end of such functions as ``sys_setresuid()``.

Note that this function consumes the caller's reference to the new credentials.
The caller should _not_ call ``put_cred()`` on the new credentials afterwards.

Furthermore, once this function has been called on a new set of credentials,
those credentials may _not_ be changed further.


Should the security checks fail or some other error occur after
``prepare_creds()`` has been called, then the following function should be
invoked::

	void abort_creds(struct cred *new);

This releases the lock on ``current->cred_replace_mutex`` that
``prepare_creds()`` got and then releases the new credentials.


A typical credentials alteration function would look something like this::

	int alter_suid(uid_t suid)
	{
		struct cred *new;
		int ret;

		new = prepare_creds();
		if (!new)
			return -ENOMEM;

		new->suid = suid;
		ret = security_alter_suid(new);
		if (ret < 0) {
			abort_creds(new);
			return ret;
		}

		return commit_creds(new);
	}


Managing Credentials
--------------------

There are some functions to help manage credentials:

 - ``void put_cred(const struct cred *cred);``

     This releases a reference to the given set of credentials.  If the
     reference count reaches zero, the credentials will be scheduled for
     destruction by the RCU system.

 - ``const struct cred *get_cred(const struct cred *cred);``

     This gets a reference on a live set of credentials, returning a pointer to
     that set of credentials.

 - ``struct cred *get_new_cred(struct cred *cred);``

     This gets a reference on a set of credentials that is under construction
     and is thus still mutable, returning a pointer to that set of credentials.


Open File Credentials
=====================

When a new file is opened, a reference is obtained on the opening task's
credentials and this is attached to the file struct as ``f_cred`` in place of
``f_uid`` and ``f_gid``.  Code that used to access ``file->f_uid`` and
``file->f_gid`` should now access ``file->f_cred->fsuid`` and
``file->f_cred->fsgid``.

It is safe to access ``f_cred`` without the use of RCU or locking because the
pointer will not change over the lifetime of the file struct, and nor will the
contents of the cred struct pointed to, barring the exceptions listed above
(see the Task Credentials section).

To avoid "confused deputy" privilege escalation attacks, access control checks
during subsequent operations on an opened file should use these credentials
instead of "current"'s credentials, as the file may have been passed to a more
privileged process.

Overriding the VFS's Use of Credentials
=======================================

Under some circumstances it is desirable to override the credentials used by
the VFS, and that can be done by calling into such as ``vfs_mkdir()`` with a
different set of credentials.  This is done in the following places:

 * ``sys_faccessat()``.
 * ``do_coredump()``.
 * nfs4recover.c.