cachepc-linux

Fork of AMDESE/linux with modifications for CachePC side-channel attack
git clone https://git.sinitax.com/sinitax/cachepc-linux
Log | Files | Refs | README | LICENSE | sfeed.txt

hash.h (5194B)


      1/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
      2#ifndef _ASM_HASH_H
      3#define _ASM_HASH_H
      4
      5/*
      6 * HP-PA only implements integer multiply in the FPU.  However, for
      7 * integer multiplies by constant, it has a number of shift-and-add
      8 * (but no shift-and-subtract, sigh!) instructions that a compiler
      9 * can synthesize a code sequence with.
     10 *
     11 * Unfortunately, GCC isn't very efficient at using them.  For example
     12 * it uses three instructions for "x *= 21" when only two are needed.
     13 * But we can find a sequence manually.
     14 */
     15
     16#define HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 1
     17
     18/*
     19 * This is a multiply by GOLDEN_RATIO_32 = 0x61C88647 optimized for the
     20 * PA7100 pairing rules.  This is an in-order 2-way superscalar processor.
     21 * Only one instruction in a pair may be a shift (by more than 3 bits),
     22 * but other than that, simple ALU ops (including shift-and-add by up
     23 * to 3 bits) may be paired arbitrarily.
     24 *
     25 * PA8xxx processors also dual-issue ALU instructions, although with
     26 * fewer constraints, so this schedule is good for them, too.
     27 *
     28 * This 6-step sequence was found by Yevgen Voronenko's implementation
     29 * of the Hcub algorithm at http://spiral.ece.cmu.edu/mcm/gen.html.
     30 */
     31static inline u32 __attribute_const__ __hash_32(u32 x)
     32{
     33	u32 a, b, c;
     34
     35	/*
     36	 * Phase 1: Compute  a = (x << 19) + x,
     37	 * b = (x << 9) + a, c = (x << 23) + b.
     38	 */
     39	a = x << 19;		/* Two shifts can't be paired */
     40	b = x << 9;	a += x;
     41	c = x << 23;	b += a;
     42			c += b;
     43	/* Phase 2: Return (b<<11) + (c<<6) + (a<<3) - c */
     44	b <<= 11;
     45	a += c << 3;	b -= c;
     46	return (a << 3) + b;
     47}
     48
     49#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
     50
     51#define HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 1
     52
     53/*
     54 * Finding a good shift-and-add chain for GOLDEN_RATIO_64 is tricky,
     55 * because available software for the purpose chokes on constants this
     56 * large.  (It's mostly designed for compiling FIR filter coefficients
     57 * into FPGAs.)
     58 *
     59 * However, Jason Thong pointed out a work-around.  The Hcub software
     60 * (http://spiral.ece.cmu.edu/mcm/gen.html) is designed for *multiple*
     61 * constant multiplication, and is good at finding shift-and-add chains
     62 * which share common terms.
     63 *
     64 * Looking at 0x0x61C8864680B583EB in binary:
     65 * 0110000111001000100001100100011010000000101101011000001111101011
     66 *  \______________/    \__________/       \_______/     \________/
     67 *   \____________________________/         \____________________/
     68 * you can see the non-zero bits are divided into several well-separated
     69 * blocks.  Hcub can find algorithms for those terms separately, which
     70 * can then be shifted and added together.
     71 *
     72 * Dividing the input into 2, 3 or 4 blocks, Hcub can find solutions
     73 * with 10, 9 or 8 adds, respectively, making a total of 11 for the
     74 * whole number.
     75 *
     76 * Using just two large blocks, 0xC3910C8D << 31 in the high bits,
     77 * and 0xB583EB in the low bits, produces as good an algorithm as any,
     78 * and with one more small shift than alternatives.
     79 *
     80 * The high bits are a larger number and more work to compute, as well
     81 * as needing one extra cycle to shift left 31 bits before the final
     82 * addition, so they are the critical path for scheduling.  The low bits
     83 * can fit into the scheduling slots left over.
     84 */
     85
     86
     87/*
     88 * This _ASSIGN(dst, src) macro performs "dst = src", but prevents GCC
     89 * from inferring anything about the value assigned to "dest".
     90 *
     91 * This prevents it from mis-optimizing certain sequences.
     92 * In particular, gcc is annoyingly eager to combine consecutive shifts.
     93 * Given "x <<= 19; y += x; z += x << 1;", GCC will turn this into
     94 * "y += x << 19; z += x << 20;" even though the latter sequence needs
     95 * an additional instruction and temporary register.
     96 *
     97 * Because no actual assembly code is generated, this construct is
     98 * usefully portable across all GCC platforms, and so can be test-compiled
     99 * on non-PA systems.
    100 *
    101 * In two places, additional unused input dependencies are added.  This
    102 * forces GCC's scheduling so it does not rearrange instructions too much.
    103 * Because the PA-8xxx is out of order, I'm not sure how much this matters,
    104 * but why make it more difficult for the processor than necessary?
    105 */
    106#define _ASSIGN(dst, src, ...) asm("" : "=r" (dst) : "0" (src), ##__VA_ARGS__)
    107
    108/*
    109 * Multiply by GOLDEN_RATIO_64 = 0x0x61C8864680B583EB using a heavily
    110 * optimized shift-and-add sequence.
    111 *
    112 * Without the final shift, the multiply proper is 19 instructions,
    113 * 10 cycles and uses only 4 temporaries.  Whew!
    114 *
    115 * You are not expected to understand this.
    116 */
    117static __always_inline u32 __attribute_const__
    118hash_64(u64 a, unsigned int bits)
    119{
    120	u64 b, c, d;
    121
    122	/*
    123	 * Encourage GCC to move a dynamic shift to %sar early,
    124	 * thereby freeing up an additional temporary register.
    125	 */
    126	if (!__builtin_constant_p(bits))
    127		asm("" : "=q" (bits) : "0" (64 - bits));
    128	else
    129		bits = 64 - bits;
    130
    131	_ASSIGN(b, a*5);	c = a << 13;
    132	b = (b << 2) + a;	_ASSIGN(d, a << 17);
    133	a = b + (a << 1);	c += d;
    134	d = a << 10;		_ASSIGN(a, a << 19);
    135	d = a - d;		_ASSIGN(a, a << 4, "X" (d));
    136	c += b;			a += b;
    137	d -= c;			c += a << 1;
    138	a += c << 3;		_ASSIGN(b, b << (7+31), "X" (c), "X" (d));
    139	a <<= 31;		b += d;
    140	a += b;
    141	return a >> bits;
    142}
    143#undef _ASSIGN	/* We're a widely-used header file, so don't litter! */
    144
    145#endif /* BITS_PER_LONG == 64 */
    146
    147#endif /* _ASM_HASH_H */