Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce.litmus (980B)
1C Z6.0+pooncerelease+poacquirerelease+fencembonceonce 2 3(* 4 * Result: Sometimes 5 * 6 * This litmus test shows that a release-acquire chain, while sufficient 7 * when there is but one non-reads-from (AKA non-rf) link, does not suffice 8 * if there is more than one. Of the three processes, only P1() reads from 9 * P0's write, which means that there are two non-rf links: P1() to P2() 10 * is a write-to-write link (AKA a "coherence" or just "co" link) and P2() 11 * to P0() is a read-to-write link (AKA a "from-reads" or just "fr" link). 12 * When there are two or more non-rf links, you typically will need one 13 * full barrier for each non-rf link. (Exceptions include some cases 14 * involving locking.) 15 *) 16 17{} 18 19P0(int *x, int *y) 20{ 21 WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1); 22 smp_store_release(y, 1); 23} 24 25P1(int *y, int *z) 26{ 27 int r0; 28 29 r0 = smp_load_acquire(y); 30 smp_store_release(z, 1); 31} 32 33P2(int *x, int *z) 34{ 35 int r1; 36 37 WRITE_ONCE(*z, 2); 38 smp_mb(); 39 r1 = READ_ONCE(*x); 40} 41 42exists (1:r0=1 /\ z=2 /\ 2:r1=0)