From 8a2ee44a371c8cbef587ea609908c3cbf1645231 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 19:13:07 +0800 Subject: btrfs: look at bi_size for repair decisions bio_readpage_error currently uses bi_vcnt to decide if it is worth retrying an I/O. But the vector count is mostly an implementation artifact - it really should figure out if there is more than a single sector worth retrying. Use bi_size for that and shift by PAGE_SHIFT. This really should be blocks/sectors, but given that btrfs doesn't support a sector size different from the PAGE_SIZE using the page size keeps the changes to a minimum. Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index 52abe4082680..dc8ba3ee515d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -2350,7 +2350,7 @@ static int bio_readpage_error(struct bio *failed_bio, u64 phy_offset, int read_mode = 0; blk_status_t status; int ret; - unsigned failed_bio_pages = bio_pages_all(failed_bio); + unsigned failed_bio_pages = failed_bio->bi_iter.bi_size >> PAGE_SHIFT; BUG_ON(bio_op(failed_bio) == REQ_OP_WRITE); -- cgit v1.2.3-71-gd317