From e7152b97f38f1f5b915c719e6a3040697a700a16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 15:04:54 -0700 Subject: err.h: IS_ERR() can accept __user pointers Sparse generates a false positive when you pass a __user or __iomem pointer to the IS_ERR() functions. drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1286.c:344:36: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1286.c:344:36: expected void const *ptr drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1286.c:344:36: got unsigned int [noderef] [usertype] *rtcregs We can silence these by adding a __force here and upgrading to Sparse v0.4.5-rc1 or later. This change has no effect when using current Sparse releases. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Acked-by: Christopher Li Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- include/linux/err.h | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/linux/err.h') diff --git a/include/linux/err.h b/include/linux/err.h index f2edce25a76b..221fcfb676c4 100644 --- a/include/linux/err.h +++ b/include/linux/err.h @@ -24,17 +24,17 @@ static inline void * __must_check ERR_PTR(long error) return (void *) error; } -static inline long __must_check PTR_ERR(const void *ptr) +static inline long __must_check PTR_ERR(__force const void *ptr) { return (long) ptr; } -static inline long __must_check IS_ERR(const void *ptr) +static inline long __must_check IS_ERR(__force const void *ptr) { return IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr); } -static inline long __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(const void *ptr) +static inline long __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr) { return !ptr || IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)ptr); } @@ -46,13 +46,13 @@ static inline long __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(const void *ptr) * Explicitly cast an error-valued pointer to another pointer type in such a * way as to make it clear that's what's going on. */ -static inline void * __must_check ERR_CAST(const void *ptr) +static inline void * __must_check ERR_CAST(__force const void *ptr) { /* cast away the const */ return (void *) ptr; } -static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(const void *ptr) +static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(__force const void *ptr) { if (IS_ERR(ptr)) return PTR_ERR(ptr); -- cgit v1.2.3-71-gd317 From 6e8b8726ad503214ba66e34aed69aff41de33489 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rusty Russell Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:19:32 +0930 Subject: PTR_RET is now PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO True, it's often used in return statements, but after much bikeshedding it's probably better to have an explicit name. (I tried just putting the IS_ERR check inside PTR_ERR itself and gcc usually generated no more code. But that clashes current expectations of how PTR_ERR behaves, so having a separate function is better). Suggested-by: Julia Lawall Suggested-by: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Julia Lawall Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell --- include/linux/err.h | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/linux/err.h') diff --git a/include/linux/err.h b/include/linux/err.h index 221fcfb676c4..15f92e072450 100644 --- a/include/linux/err.h +++ b/include/linux/err.h @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static inline void * __must_check ERR_CAST(__force const void *ptr) return (void *) ptr; } -static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(__force const void *ptr) +static inline int __must_check PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(__force const void *ptr) { if (IS_ERR(ptr)) return PTR_ERR(ptr); @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ static inline int __must_check PTR_RET(__force const void *ptr) return 0; } +/* Deprecated */ +#define PTR_RET(p) PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(p) + #endif #endif /* _LINUX_ERR_H */ -- cgit v1.2.3-71-gd317