| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
./tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c:353:3-4: Unneeded
semicolon.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, we simply hang using "while (1) ;" upon any unexpected
guest traps because the default guest trap handler is guest_hang().
The above approach is not useful to anyone because KVM selftests
users will only see a hung application upon any unexpected guest
trap.
This patch improves unexpected guest trap handling for KVM RISC-V
selftests by doing the following:
1) Return to host user-space
2) Dump VCPU registers
3) Die using TEST_ASSERT(0, ...)
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Tested-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The guest_hang() function is used as the default exception handler
for various KVM selftests applications by setting it's address in
the vstvec CSR. The vstvec CSR requires exception handler base address
to be at least 4-byte aligned so this patch fixes alignment of the
guest_hang() function.
Fixes: 3e06cdf10520 ("KVM: selftests: Add initial support for RISC-V
64-bit")
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Tested-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
|
|
|
We add initial support for RISC-V 64-bit in KVM selftests using
which we can cross-compile and run arch independent tests such as:
demand_paging_test
dirty_log_test
kvm_create_max_vcpus,
kvm_page_table_test
set_memory_region_test
kvm_binary_stats_test
All VM guest modes defined in kvm_util.h require at least 48-bit
guest virtual address so to use KVM RISC-V selftests hardware
need to support at least Sv48 MMU for guest (i.e. VS-mode).
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
|
